WHAT THE HELL!!!

DID YOU GUYS SEE IGN'S REVIEW FOR MW:R?!! somethin's fishy about this. i've seen atleast 8 different ingame vids for the game to see that there were little to NO dips in the frame rate EVEN online. the graphics were WELL done, i HAVE MW for 360 and compared them, aside from reflex not havin the same level of texture quality the games are FREAKIN IDENTICAL right down to the high action seens. and someone tell me how the HELL the accuracy and controls can be bad when you can FREAKIN REMAP THEN COMPLETELY?!!! from what i saw, its EXACTLY the same as the conduit's...the same feature they praised.

am i the only one who thinks that somethin is funny about this review? bozon even had the galls to say that WaW had better graphics then reflex...WAW LOOKED LIKE AN N64 GAME!!! considerin how LOW my expectations were for reflex, i can't believe i'm defendin this port, but i know when somethin is bein screwed. i'll even be as bold as to say that reflex is visually one of the best lookin wii games to date(considerin its port status and WAAAY lower amount of dev time and fundin) and completely impressed me. i don't know what the hells goin on, but this was fishy right from the start with bozon's hands-on, and his outta nowhere review for MW2...how did HE review the game? bozon is on ign's nintendo team and only reviews wii and DS games, how did he get to review a 360 game? another funny thing, after readin the 100 somethin comments, literally EVERYONE who got reflex(includin those that beat it and rented it)all said that there were NO such frame rate drops in neither the campaign OR the multiplayer. and they all pretty much said that its hard to see much of a difference from the 360/ps3 version visually.

Two words: CALM DOWN!

take a deep breath. inhale....exhale. get a glass of water now.

joking aside, yeah, i thought the review was fishy enough because i've seen a lot of leaked footages and the graphics are great, for a port. not to mention they used pics from the pre-beta footages like morons. as for the review itself, that was a little low coming from bozon, but i can't blame him since he's got modern warfare 2 stuck in his mind. i bet he wanted to review the game fast so he can get back playing mw2.

looking at the game myself, i'd give it a solid 8, even though i haven't played it yet. the visuals look neat, the gun seems to move well seeing as how it's controlled, and the online looks very cool and fast-paced.

Jaques7Chef wrote:Two words: CALM DOWN!

.....*SIGH*....i'm sorry. its just that this pissed me off. if i wasn't black, my face would be red as blood right now.

It's alright, I'm just as shocked as you are. How can IGN say WaW was better when the Wii now has the best COD game?

My conspiracy theory is that Microsoft paid off IGN again.That, or IGN are fucktards that are way too biased.

this crap urks me to no end. fact of the matter is, the game shoulda NEVER been a port in the first place. it shoulda been released on the wii right from the start, givin it the same amount of dev time and fundin right along with the other versions...but instead IW thought it was better to ditch the wii cause its "inferior" and can't produce the same film-like effect as 360/ps3...then turn around and put not one, but BOTH MW games on the DS...what the HELL kinda sense does that make.

do you know whats gonna happen now? the game was already doomed to low sales simply for bein 2yrs late, now sales are gonna be even worst due to absolutely NO kinda media attention, it was released alongside MW2(VERY stupid move) givin it even LESS attention, and now its got a bad review behind it as well. there's no way reflex can succeed now, which pretty much dooms ths wii's chances of gettin any upcommin main series CoD games, AND IW will have won this little feud with treyarch...they're probably sittin back LOLin right now at treyarch and wii owners sayin..."we TOLD you CoD will never have a place on the wii...NICE EPIC FAIL TREYARCH, stay away from our games."

Permafry_42 wrote:My conspiracy theory is that Microsoft paid off IGN again.That, or IGN are fucktards that are way too biased.

better yet, i bet INFINITY WARD payed them off and even threw in a chance for bozon to get extra journalist time by lettin him review MW2...a game that he shoulda had NOTHIN to do with outside of pure consumer enjoyment.

...Why does it matter if Modern Warfare 2 is out right now? Seriously, just go buy that game instead.

We need Matt back in the Nintendo IGN Team. He did good reviews, way better than Bozon.

Ciflit wrote:...Why does it matter if Modern Warfare 2 is out right now? Seriously, just go buy that game instead.

Because, people don't have the money to buy it, or they have run out of copies for it. Ever thought of that?

SpaniardGamer wrote:We need Matt back in the Nintendo IGN Team. He did good reviews, way better than Bozon.

Ciflit wrote:...Why does it matter if Modern Warfare 2 is out right now? Seriously, just go buy that game instead.

Because, people don't have the money to buy it, or they have run out of copies for it. Ever thought of that?

my bet is he hasn't.

It said he did, but he became Top Editor, or that's what I heard from IGN. Probably it changed, I don't know.

Permafry_42 wrote:

SpaniardGamer wrote:We need Matt back in the Nintendo IGN Team. He did good reviews, way better than Bozon.

Ciflit wrote:...Why does it matter if Modern Warfare 2 is out right now? Seriously, just go buy that game instead.

Because, people don't have the money to buy it, or they have run out of copies for it. Ever thought of that?

my bet is he hasn't.

...It's $10 more. And no stores I know of ran out of copies for it, including my local game-stop and Wal-Mart.

Ciflit wrote:

Permafry_42 wrote:

SpaniardGamer wrote:We need Matt back in the Nintendo IGN Team. He did good reviews, way better than Bozon.

Ciflit wrote:...Why does it matter if Modern Warfare 2 is out right now? Seriously, just go buy that game instead.

Because, people don't have the money to buy it, or they have run out of copies for it. Ever thought of that?

my bet is he hasn't.

...It's $10 more. And no stores I know of ran out of copies for it, including my local game-stop and Wal-Mart.

lucky you then. while i have a PC and a PS3, i would only want to play a shooter on either Wii or PC. therefore, i either need to upgrade my PC to about a $500 computer, get a new $500 computer, or i just buy the Wii version of the game (assuming i get it at all.)

i might go out drink beer until i passout after seeing that review,

im waiting for gamespots reviews, i got my money on that they will give it a 6.5.. i hate gamespots reviews there even worse.

Permafry_42 wrote:

Ciflit wrote:

Permafry_42 wrote:

SpaniardGamer wrote:We need Matt back in the Nintendo IGN Team. He did good reviews, way better than Bozon.

Ciflit wrote:...Why does it matter if Modern Warfare 2 is out right now? Seriously, just go buy that game instead.

Because, people don't have the money to buy it, or they have run out of copies for it. Ever thought of that?

my bet is he hasn't.

...It's $10 more. And no stores I know of ran out of copies for it, including my local game-stop and Wal-Mart.

lucky you then. while i have a PC and a PS3, i would only want to play a shooter on either Wii or PC. therefore, i either need to upgrade my PC to about a $500 computer, get a new $500 computer, or i just buy the Wii version of the game (assuming i get it at all.)

So you will give up on playing possibly the best shooter this year because you don't like controllers? That's pretty silly.

Ciflit wrote:

Permafry_42 wrote:

Ciflit wrote:

Permafry_42 wrote:

SpaniardGamer wrote:We need Matt back in the Nintendo IGN Team. He did good reviews, way better than Bozon.

Ciflit wrote:...Why does it matter if Modern Warfare 2 is out right now? Seriously, just go buy that game instead.

Because, people don't have the money to buy it, or they have run out of copies for it. Ever thought of that?

my bet is he hasn't.

...It's $10 more. And no stores I know of ran out of copies for it, including my local game-stop and Wal-Mart.

lucky you then. while i have a PC and a PS3, i would only want to play a shooter on either Wii or PC. therefore, i either need to upgrade my PC to about a $500 computer, get a new $500 computer, or i just buy the Wii version of the game (assuming i get it at all.)

So you will give up on playing possibly the best shooter this year because you don't like controllers? That's pretty silly.

would you be willing to play basketball with only your feet? It is possible for me to do reasonable at FPS games with a game contoller, but i do a lot better with a keyboard and mouse. controls can make all the difference in the world.

I'm just sayin', getting MW2 is worth having to play with a controller.

Ciflit wrote:I'm just sayin', getting MW2 is worth having to play with a controller.

my brother has it, so if i feel like playing it so much then i can just watch him play the game (we did the same thing with halo and Uncharted 2, though i showed him Uncharted 2))

personally its consolism at its worst lol they are mad because a game people praised the HD consoles for is on wii and it turned out good. Now i have to admit i know the wii can handle more players and wii speak but the time wasn't there. And people have said cod 4 was better then 6 donno why i cant judge them they are to similar flaws and advantages in both but the review was a little wack. Now when CoD 7 come to wii you can expect it will have wii speak and due to timing no DLC maps probably We will see better visuals and more players in game. Mabye even ground war. I think Reflex is up to par with the original and with the controls it felt even better to sneak around on single player. made me feel more like i was there. Altho call of duties immersion is no where near metriod prime but still i felt more into the game on wii then 360

Jade789119 wrote:personally its consolism at its worst lol they are mad because a game people praised the HD consoles for is on wii and it turned out good. Now i have to admit i know the wii can handle more players and wii speak but the time wasn't there. And people have said cod 4 was better then 6 donno why i cant judge them they are to similar flaws and advantages in both but the review was a little wack. Now when CoD 7 come to wii you can expect it will have wii speak and due to timing no DLC maps probably We will see better visuals and more players in game. Mabye even ground war. I think Reflex is up to par with the original and with the controls it felt even better to sneak around on single player. made me feel more like i was there. Altho call of duties immersion is no where near metriod prime but still i felt more into the game on wii then 360

couldn'ta said it better. i think IW(and every other wii basher)is upset now cause a "second rate" dev like treyarch not only proved them wrong(these guys said that MW and its engine simply couldn't run on the wii PERIOD due to it bein "inferior") about the wii not bein able to run the game, they also showed them up by makin a port with ATLEAST 3x less dev time, WAAAY less budget, AND way less experience with the series...all on "inferior tech". reflex also makes IW look like either liers, racist against the wii(devs lose some credibility if known for unreasonable hatred for consoles), or just down right lazy devs who simply didn't wanna take the time to merely take a game and rework controls and visuals. which of these makes them look worst? cause they ALL sound bad to me.

darkwingdragon709 wrote:

Jaques7Chef wrote:Two words: CALM DOWN!

.....*SIGH*....i'm sorry. its just that this pissed me off. if i wasn't black, my face would be red as blood right now.

HAHAHA DYING

Ign: Wii Hater Central

To me wii haters lost their credibility as devs or reviewers. If they keep up what they are doing they'll become some of the most hated developers by wii owners. I already dont like infinity ward for not even trying not to mention reflex gives cod 4 a whole new edge that made it more fun for me to play.Most people probably wont agree but i like it ore on wii then my 360 the controls just make it 5 X better. and visuals probably take off 1 point in my book. Visuals are worth 10 % of my reviews and even so reflex looked great. Some moments on campaign look top notch. and easly "next gen graphics" hate the term

there's 2 things i dont like in reflex:
1.the enemy isnt displayed on a map,there's only the little compass thingy which shows the objective's.
2.killing muslims isnt very fun.