Violence limits the potential of games, says Miyamoto

AxelDemon wrote:

fox mccloud wrote:obviously
games that RELY on it basically games where u have to show off blood or someone getting their head chopped off in order to make it "seem" atleast "good"

So' how do you feel about madworld

madworld cannot be compared to GOW whn it comes to this subject because the blood feels like its actually "part" of the game, its hard to put this in words but madworld made a actual 'mad world' where ti centers around its design and creativity the blood is part of it but in a good way and the graphics were made for the world instead of god of war where it is like "we put blood and gore in here for the awesome factor" type deal while madworld is actually built around that factor and adds to the gameplay and immersion, gives it a more artistic value, in those gay arguments of ignorant ppl using violence as making video games "evil" i would honestly use madworld more thn GOW3 because of its artistic value of using violence and blood and gore in the game where is GOW puts it in for no artistic value but to have a guys head ripped off or his intestines pulled out
there i tried to explain it as best i can on a monday

I agree with Miyamoto. thats all I have to say

Miyamoto is like Gill (SF3) of video games but not crazy

I don't get it.
Madworld = violence to sell
GoW = violence to sell

soaringdive wrote:I don't get it.
Madworld = violence to sell
GoW = violence to sell

Madworld = Comedy, cool character, story development.
GoW = Sex, Gore, Blood

God of World, the title says what the game is about and all it is. War
Madworld is a title in which it could be many things and it was many things.

AxelDemon wrote:

Gyoza wrote:God of World, the title says what the game is about and all it is. War
Madworld is a title in which it could be many things and it was many things.

OOPS MY BAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWD, WAS THAT ME THINK OF TWO THINGS AT ONCE BECAUSE YOU NEVER DO IT.

But seriously your post was unnecessary. You know what I meant